Evaluation
How well did the summer school achieve its objectives?
|
|
very poorly |
poorly |
acceptably |
well |
very well |
|
experience of techniques |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
13 |
|
sense of community |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
20 |
|
non-members |
0 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
5 |
|
|
very poor |
poor |
acceptable |
good |
very good |
|
pre-meeting organisation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
16 |
|
facilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
16 |
|
organisation during meeting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
19 |
|
|
very poor |
poor |
acceptable |
good |
very good |
|
overall |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentage in rating category |
0 |
0 |
5.4 |
29.5 |
65.1 |
Please give brief comments on up to three features, events etc that you felt particularly positive about
The sessions
- The content of the lectures & topics
-
Good mixture between computing and psychology
- Overview of a large variety of different techniques
- Diversity of approaches / opinions
- The sessions were comprehensive and informative to all levels and all disciplines
- The material presented was diverse for breadth
- Very comprehensive overview of the state of the art and available databases
- Demonstrations
- Timetable well thought out – good variety, hands on
- Possibility to see the actual material/methods (“hands on”)
- Hands on sessions -> very interesting
- Hands-on sessions …providing a feel and introduction to a broad spectrum of research
- Hands on sessions. This should be the model for all subsequent summer schools
- Hands on experiencing different methods
- Hands on sessions very valuable overall
- The demonstrations
- Highly enjoyable practical sessions
- Workshop size very manageable
- Nicely and thoughtfully organised
- Computing
- The facilities
- Overall atmosphere
- The absolute absence of competition among researchers
- A good sense of co-operation among Humaine members
- Emotional climate between HUMAINE members – nobody standing outside
- In general – strong exchange of knowledge
- Friendly atmosphere
- Overall feel and friendly atmosphere
- Friendly and enthusiastic atmosphere
- The idea that a net is being created with friendly people
- Glad to find a really relaxed atmosphere
- Not trying to cram too much into each day
- I felt relaxed (no hurry)
- Socialising, discussions, meeting people I hadn’t previously known
- The get-together after sessions
- Social events
- Lunch and dinners
- Accommodation
-
Organisation
-
Organisation wonderful … hotel, meals
-
Very good organisation. Belfast Castle
-
Visit to castle -> great environment & very nice evening
-
Community events …were very well orchestrated and successful in their objective, to bring people together.
-
Belfast Driving simulator (x2)
-
Anvil (x2)
-
Feeltrace
-
Plenum meeting
-
Discussion on ethics – clear and simple, yet important
(sessions which were not practical)
-
some presentations didn’t offer hands-on sessions
application of some techniques not clear
facial expression session – no practice, only speech
not being able to see all sessions
I would like to have attended all hands on sessions, not only 4 out of 6 each day
some who don’t have a sense of time
discussion time
hands-on time
little or no input on more technical problematical issues related to recording emotional material
not enough time for questions
internet access
starting time too late
none
Please give brief comments on up to three features, events etc that you felt particularly negative about


SocialCom 2012 workshop on: Exploring Stances in Interactions: Conceptual and Practical Issues in Social Signal Processing Research
